Difference between revisions of "Māsabhakṣaṇa"
m (moved Talk:Māihsabhakṣaṇa to Talk:Māsabhakṣaṇa) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Māsabhakṣaṇa literally means ‘eating of flesh’. | Māsabhakṣaṇa literally means ‘eating of flesh’. | ||
| − | + | It has been a subject discussed in the dharmaśāstras. During the early Vedic period, and also during the period of the Upaniṣads, flesh-eating, including beef, seems to have been quite common. It was a part of the madhuparka usually offered to an honored guest<ref>Aśvalāyana Gṛhyasutra 1.24.25</ref>. | |
| − | Apart from the kṣattriya kings even the sages like Yājñavalkya have been mentioned as consuming meat | + | Apart from the kṣattriya kings even the sages like Yājñavalkya have been mentioned as consuming meat<ref>Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 3.1.2.21</ref>. Animals immolated in sacrifices like horse, ox, goat and ram were cooked and eaten<ref>Aitareya Brāhmaṇa 6.8</ref>. |
However, as the Aryans moved towards the Indo-Gangetic plains and cultivation of food-crops picked up in momentum, eating of the flesh of animals gradually reduced and was even looked down upon. The growth of Jainism and Buddhism also delivered a powerful blow to this practice. | However, as the Aryans moved towards the Indo-Gangetic plains and cultivation of food-crops picked up in momentum, eating of the flesh of animals gradually reduced and was even looked down upon. The growth of Jainism and Buddhism also delivered a powerful blow to this practice. | ||
| − | Development of the doctrine of ahinsā, gradual replacement of the Vedic sacrificial religion by the paurāṇic modes of worship and the Bhāgavata-sect, contributed to the disappearance or minimization of the practice of eating meat. Protection of the cow, the roots of which are found even in the Ṛgveda | + | Development of the doctrine of ahinsā, gradual replacement of the Vedic sacrificial religion by the paurāṇic modes of worship and the Bhāgavata-sect, contributed to the disappearance or minimization of the practice of eating meat. Protection of the cow, the roots of which are found even in the Ṛgveda<ref>Ṛgveda 1.164.27; 4.1.6; 8.69.21</ref>, became an article of faith with the whole society. Now, even those who have been meat eaters for ages, have either given it up or take it only occasionally and not daily. |
| − | + | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 18 December 2016
By Swami Harshananda
Sometimes transliterated as: Masabhaksana, MAsabhakSaNa, Maasabhakshana
Māsabhakṣaṇa literally means ‘eating of flesh’.
It has been a subject discussed in the dharmaśāstras. During the early Vedic period, and also during the period of the Upaniṣads, flesh-eating, including beef, seems to have been quite common. It was a part of the madhuparka usually offered to an honored guest[1].
Apart from the kṣattriya kings even the sages like Yājñavalkya have been mentioned as consuming meat[2]. Animals immolated in sacrifices like horse, ox, goat and ram were cooked and eaten[3].
However, as the Aryans moved towards the Indo-Gangetic plains and cultivation of food-crops picked up in momentum, eating of the flesh of animals gradually reduced and was even looked down upon. The growth of Jainism and Buddhism also delivered a powerful blow to this practice.
Development of the doctrine of ahinsā, gradual replacement of the Vedic sacrificial religion by the paurāṇic modes of worship and the Bhāgavata-sect, contributed to the disappearance or minimization of the practice of eating meat. Protection of the cow, the roots of which are found even in the Ṛgveda[4], became an article of faith with the whole society. Now, even those who have been meat eaters for ages, have either given it up or take it only occasionally and not daily.
References
- The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore
