Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Anyathāsiddha

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Anyathāsiddha literally means ‘proved or demonstrated otherwise’.

One of the topics considered to be very important and hence frequently discussed in the works of philosophy and logic, is the relationship between kāraṇa-the cause and kārya-the effect. With regard to a given effect, determining its cause or causes, both primary and subsidiary, is of great significance since the same methods of logic will have to be extended to determine the final cause of this universe.

A given effect might have been produced by a single cause or several causes. Again, among these several causes one might be primary and the others secondary. To illustrate :

  • A pot is a kārya or effect.
  • Its kāraṇas or causes are clay, potter’s wheel, stick and the potter himself.
  • Though all these are causes, clay is the primary cause and all the others are secondary causes. What is common to all these causes is that they are immediately antecedent to the effect, the pot.

However, any other thing, merely by its being antecedent to the pot, cannot be considered as its cause. For instance, the ass that brings the clay, the sound made by the potter’s wheel or the stick or the potter’s father—none of these can be considered as the cause of the pot since its coming into existence can be demonstrated otherwise i.e., without reference to this particular cause also. Such causes are said to be anyathā-siddha (anyathā = otherwise, siddha = demonstrated), and hence rejected as superfluous.


References[edit]

  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore