Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children is now freely available.
Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Laksanā

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Laksanā literally means ‘implication’.

Modes of Expression of Words[edit]

There are three ways in which words can express their meanings. They are:

  1. The direct way or vācya, as for instance ‘ayah’ which means iron.
  2. The meaning hinted at or vyañgya as in ‘saśaṅkhacakro harih,’ ‘Viṣṇu with śañkha (conch) and cakra (discus)’. Here though the word ‘harih’ has several meanings like lion, monkey, Yama, Vāyu or Viṣṇu, the additional word ‘saśaṅkhacakrah’ limits it to Viṣṇu alone.
  3. The implied meaning or lakṣya is the third. For instance in the sentence ‘Kaliṅgah sāhasikah’, ‘The Kaliñga is a bold man’, though the word ‘Kaliṅga’ means the country of that name, by implication it denotes a citizen of that country.

Types of Implication[edit]

Implication is called as ‘lakṣaṇā’. It is of three types:

  1. Jahal-lakṣaṇā - In ‘jahal-lakṣaṇā’, the direct meaning is completely given up (jahad = giving up) in favor of the implied meaning. For example, consider the sentence ‘gaṅgāyām ghoṣah’, ‘The village of cowherds is in the Gaṅgā river’. Since a village cannot exist inside a river it is to be interpreted as ‘on the bank of the Gañgā river’ so near that it looks as if it is under the river.
  2. Ajahal-lakṣaṇā - In ‘ajahal-lakṣaṇā’ the direct meaning is not altogether given up[1] though it cannot also be accepted in toto. For instance, in the sentence ‘śoṇah dhāvati’ which means ‘red color is running’, obviously it means a red animal like a horse which is running and not red color (śoṇa = red) itself.
  3. Jahad-ajahal-lakṣaṇā - In ‘jahad-ajahal-lakṣaṇā’, a part of the direct meaning is given up and another part is retained. In a sentence like ‘soyam devadattah’ which means ‘This is that Devadatta’, Devadatta who is seen here and now is recognized as the same person seen earlier in some other place. In this recognition,Devadatta, the person, is retained whereas the time and place are ignored.

Advaitins adopt ‘jahad-ajahal-lakṣaṇā’ by interpreting the famous Vedāntic dicta like tat tvam asi (‘That thou art’) or aham brahmāsmi (‘I am Brahman’).

References[edit]

  1. ↑ Ajahad means not giving up.
  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore

Contributors to this article

Apurva Mahendra Bhangdia, Deval Sancheti

Explore Other Articles

Retrieved from "https://hindupedia.com/index.php?title=Laksanā&oldid=134876"