Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Satpratipakṣa

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Satpratipakṣa literally means ‘inferentially contradicted middle’.

The well-known example given for anumāna or inference in the systems of logic like the Nyāya Darśana runs as follows:

There is fire on the yonder hill; because there is smoke. Wherever there is smoke, there is fire.

There are three factors here. They are called:

  1. Pakṣa - minor term, the hill
  2. Sādhya - major term, the fire
  3. Liñga or hetu - middle term, the smoke

However, an inference can be fallacious. This is called hetvābhāsa and it is of five types. The satpratipakṣa is the third in the series. Here, the middle term is contradicted by another statement which is sat or real. Suppose the first statement is:

Sound is eternal, because it is audible.

This is contradicted by a second one thus:

Sound is non-eternal because it is produced like a pot.

Here the non-existence of eternity in the first is proved by the second inference[1] which is sat or real.


References[edit]

  1. It is a pratipakṣa or opposition view.
  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore

Contributors to this article

Explore Other Articles