Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Talk:Ekapadamurti

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

Ekapādamurti (‘image with one leg’) God has sometimes been described in the Hindu scriptures as Ekapāt or Ekapādah since the manifested universe is only a quarter (pāda = quarter) of him. The word is applied to both Siva and Viṣṇu. ‘Ajaikapāt’ is one of the epithets of Siva, used even in the Rgveda (6.50.14; 10.64.4).


Ekapadamurti.jpg


The Ekapadamurti is actually the iconographic representation of the Vedic concept of Siva as Ajaikapāt. In this form he has only one leg. He is described as the nakṣatras should be different. If they are the same, then they should be of the auspicious type. For instance, the nakṣatras Rohiṇī, Ārdrā, Makha, Viśākha, Puṣya, Srāvaṇa, Revati and Uttarābhādrā are considered highly auspicious. On the other hand, Pṅrvābhādra, Dhaniṣṭhā, Punarvasu, Kṛttikā, Mṛgaśira, Citta, Hasta, Uttara-phalgunī, Jyeṣṭhā, Purvā- ṣāḍhā and Uttarāṣāḍhā are considered prohibited and hence, inauspicious. Even when marriage is performed between persons having a permitted ekanakṣatra, the pādas (quarters) should be different. Violation of these rules may result in evil consequences including the death of one of the spouses. See also VIVĀHA. Ekānainśā (‘One who is without parts’) Ekānaihśā is a folk goddess who is identified with Durgā, who was the daugh¬ter of Nanda and Yaśodā. It was she who was exchanged for baby Kṛṣṇa. She escaped from the clutches of the tyrant Kariisa, warned him of his approaching death and disappeared. She is also described as the tribal divinity of the Vṛṣṇi clan, of Kṛṣṇa-Vāsu- deva. She again, is pictured as Subhadrā, the sister of Balarāma and Kṛṣṇa. Iconographical representations show her in the standing posture, with two arms, one resting on the loins and the other holding a lotus.