Talk:Abhishek Kaicker

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Sachi Anjunkar

Abhishek Kaicker is Associate Professor in the Department of History at University of California, Berkeley[1], as of November 2022. According to his bio, his research focuses on questions of intellectual history and the history of concepts; early modern global history; religion, politics and the city; and more generally in the continuities between precolonial and postcolonial south Asia.

As per his bio, he has published no books, papers or research pertaining to Hindus, rights of Hindus, the impact or relationship between Islam and Hinduism / Hindutva, India or the Indian Government, Ancient India, Indus Civilization or caste.

In 2021, he along with Hibatullah Akhundzada, the supreme leader of the Taliban, co-signed a letter supporting "Dismantling Global Hindutva" Conference, as an academic and scholar and made the allegation

"the current government of India [in 2021] has instituted discriminatory policies including beef bans, restrictions on religious conversion and interfaith weddings, and the introduction of religious discrimination into India’s citizenship laws. The result has been a horrifying rise in religious and caste-based violence, including hate crimes, lynchings, and rapes directed against Muslims, non-conforming Dalits, Sikhs, Christians, adivasis and other dissident Hindus. Women of these communities are especially targeted. Meanwhile, the government has used every tool of harassment and intimidation to muzzle dissent. Dozens of student activists and human rights defenders are currently languishing in jail indefinitely without due process under repressive anti-terrorism laws."[2]

On November 5, 2017, he signed the letter submitted by the South Asia Faculty Group (SAFG) to the California State Board of Education[3] where he:

  • He misrepresented scholarship stating "Mythological terms substitute for historical ones for example the 'Indus Valley Civilization' (a fact-based geographic term) appears to be replaced with a religiously-motivated and ideologically charged term 'Indus-Saraswati/Sarasvati Civilization'. The Saraswati is a mythical river"[4][5][6]
  • Implied that Christians and Muslims existed in Ancient India, prior to the founding of these religions ​

Publications related to India[edit]

Book Publications[edit]

  1. Kaicker, Abhishek. The King and the People. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Essays[edit]

  1. Kaicker, Abhishek. “‘Briskness in the Market of Shaikh-Dom’: The Commercialization of Piety in Early Eighteenth-Century Delhi.” History of Religions, vol. 61, no. 3, University of Chicago Press, Feb. 2022, pp. 243–78, https://doi.org/10.1086/717640.
  2. Kaicker, Abhishek. “The Little Conquest of the Red Fort – by Abhishek Kaicker.” Journal18: A Journal of Eighteenth-Century Art and Culture, 11 June 2021, www.journal18.org/nq/the-little-conquest-of-the-red-fort-by-abhishek-kaicker/.
  3. Kaicker, Abhishek. “Petitions and Local Politics in the Late Mughal Empire: The View from Kol, 1741.” Modern Asian Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 21–51, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x17000312.
  4. Kaicker, A. The Promises and Perils of Courtly Poetry: The Case of Mir ʿAbd al-Jalil Bilgrami (1660-1725) in the Late Mughal Empire. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 61(3), 2018, 327-360. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341454

References[edit]

  1. Abhishek Kaicker page on University of California, Berkeley accessed November 10, 2022
  2. "Letter of Support", Dismantling Global Hindutva Conference website, accessed August 7, 2022
  3. 2017 South Asia Faculty Group (SAFG) Letter to the California State Board of Education
  4. Chakrabarti, Dilip, and Sukhdev Saini. The Problem of the Sarasvati River and Notes on the Archaeological Geography of Haryana and Indian Punjab. Aryan Books International, 2009.
  5. Danino, Michel. The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati. Penguin Books, 2010.
  6. McIntosh, Jane R. A Peaceful Realm: The Rise and Fall of the Indus Civilization. Westview Press, 2002, p. 24. ​where she stated "Suddenly it became apparent that the “Indus” Civilization was a misnomer—although the Indus had played a major role in the development of the civilization, the “lost Saraswati” River, judging by the density of settlement along its banks, had contributed an equal or greater part to its prosperity. Many people today refer to this early state as the “Indus-Saraswati Civilization” and continuing references to the “Indus Civilization” should be an abbreviation in which the “Saraswati” is implied. There are some fifty sites known along the Indus whereas the Saraswati has almost 1,000. This is misleading figure because erosion and alluviation has between them destroyed or deeply buried the greater part of settlements in the Indus Valley itself, but there can be no doubt that the Saraswati system did yield a high proportion of the Indus people’s agricultural produce"