Talk:Akeel Bilgrami

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Sachi Anjunkar


Akeel Bilgrami is a Sidney Morgenbesser Professor of Philosophy, at the Department of Philosophy at Columbia University as of February 2023 [1]. According to his university profile, Professor Bilgrami's interest lies in the philosophy of language and mind as well as political philosophy and moral psychology, particularly as they relate to politics, political economy, history, and culture.

In 2021, he along with Hibatullah Akhundzada, the supreme leader of the Taliban, co-signed a letter supporting "Dismantling Global Hindutva" Conference, as an academic and scholar and made the allegation

"the current government of India [in 2021] has instituted discriminatory policies including beef bans, restrictions on religious conversion and interfaith weddings, and the introduction of religious discrimination into India’s citizenship laws. The result has been a horrifying rise in religious and caste-based violence, including hate crimes, lynchings, and rapes directed against Muslims, non-conforming Dalits, Sikhs, Christians, adivasis and other dissident Hindus. Women in these communities are especially targeted. Meanwhile, the government has used every tool of harassment and intimidation to muzzle dissent. Dozens of student activists and human rights defenders are currently languishing in jail indefinitely without due process under repressive anti-terrorism laws."[2]

Publications related to India[edit]

  1. Bilgrami, Akeel, and Jonathan R. Cole. “Who’s Afraid of Academic Freedom?” Philpapers.org, 2015, philpapers.org/rec/BILWAO .
  2. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Democratic Culture: Historical and Philosophical Essays.” Philpapers.org, 2013, philpapers.org/rec/BILDCH-3 .
  3. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Reflections on Three Populisms.” Philpapers.org, 2018, philpapers.org/rec/BILROT-4 .
  4. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Secularism: Its Content and Context.” Philpapers.org, 2014, philpapers.org/rec/BILSIC .
  5. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Gandhi’s Integrity: The Philosophy behind the Politics.” Postcolonial Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2002, pp. 79–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790220126906.
  6. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Occidentalism, the Very Idea: An Essay on Enlightenment and Enchantment.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 32, no. 3, Mar. 2006, pp. 381–411, https://doi.org/10.1086/505373.
  7. Dummett, Michael, and Akeel Bilgrami. Truth and the Past. Columbia University Press, 2006.
  8. Bilgrami, Akeel. “Reflections on Three Populisms.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 44, no. 4, May 2018, pp. 453–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718772896. Accessed 9 Oct. 2020.
  9. Bilgrami, Akeel. "Belief and Meaning : The Unity and Locality of Mental Content". Blackwell, 1994.
  10. Bilgrami Akeel. "Nature and Value". Columbia University Press, 2020.
  11. Bilgrami Akeel. "Self-Knowledge and Resentment". Harvard University Press, 2012.
  12. Bilgrami, Akeel. Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment. Harvard University Press, 2014.
    In the chapter entitled "Summary of Essay - Gandhi, the Philosopher from Secularism, Identity and Enchantment
    Bilgrami states that Hindu-Muslim riots and Caste system within Hinduism acted as hindrances towards Gandhi’s vision to Improve the state of India. He believes all forms of religious intolerance (including genocide) would be preferable to caste[3]. He states without substantiation that the social psychology of the Hindu caste system consists of an exclusionary attitude. For each caste, there was a lower caste which constituted the other and which was to be excluded from one’s way of life, again by the most brutal physical and psychological violence."

References[edit]

  1. Akeel Bilgrami University Page accessed February 22, 2023,
  2. "Letter of Support", Dismantling Global Hindutva Conference website, accessed August 7, 2022
  3. "When I think sometimes about caste in India—without a doubt the most resilient form of exclusionary social inegalitarianism in the history of the world—it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that even the most alarming aspects of religious intolerance are preferable to it. To say “You must be my brother,” however wrong, is better than saying “You will never be my brother.” In religious intolerance there is at least a small core which is highly attractive."