Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Tarkasañgraha

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Origin & Author of Tarkasañgraha[edit]

The Tarkasañgraha is an elementary treatise on logic as delineated in the Nyāya and Vaiśeṣika systems of philosophy. It's author is Annambhaṭṭa who probably lived during the period A. D. 1625-1700. He was a brāhmaṇa belonging to a Ṛgveda school. He hailed from the Tailaṅga country.[1] His father was Meligiri Tirumalarāya. Annambhaṭṭa was a great scholar in Advaita Vedānta, Vyākaraṇa[2] and Mīmānsā.

Summary of Tarkasañgraha[edit]

The whole work is in prose and has ten sections. A brief summary of the work may now be attempted here:

  1. The first section enumerates the seven categories known as the saptapadārthas in the Vaiśeṣika philosophy and explains them in details.
  2. The second section describes the various dravyas or substances.
  3. The third section deals with the characteristic marks of the twenty-four guṇas or qualities.
  4. The fourth section starts delineating the epistemology[3] according to the Nyāya and the Vaiśeṣika systems. Pratyaksa[4] is dealt with in detail here.
  5. The fifth section deals with anumānas or inference, with all the necessary details, including ‘false knowledge’.
  6. The sixth section briefly describes upamāna or analogy.
  7. The seventh section is concerned with śabda or verbal testimony.
  8. The eighth section consists of only the Dīpikā[5] which discusses the theory of knowledge according to the Nyāya school. The theory of the Mīmānsā school is taken up and refuted.
  9. The subject of the ninth section is ayathārtha-anubhava or erroneous apprehension. It also deals with the five padārthas[6] left out earlier, viz., karma,[7] sāmānya[8] and so on.
  10. The last section is the concluding chapter. Here the author has tried to prove that the padārthas or categories are only seven and not more as enumerated by the Nyāya system of Gautama. He also states that, ultimately it is jñāna or knowledge that leads to liberation.

Commentaries on Tarkasañgraha[edit]

On the Tarkasañgraha he himself wrote a commentary called Tarkadipikā or Dipikā. Actually there are 25 commentaries on the Tarkasañgraha and 10 on the Dipikā. This denotes it's popularity over the centuries.


References[edit]

  1. It is the modern Andhra Pradesh.
  2. Vyākaraṇa means Sanskrit grammar.
  3. Epistomology means methods of knowledge.
  4. Pratyaksa means direct perception.
  5. Dīpikā is Annambhaṭṭā’s gloss on his own work.
  6. Padārthas means substances.
  7. Karma means action.
  8. It means universal.
  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore